Kimchi Puts Pump.fun Back in His Bio and His Token Jumps 150%: Is the Partnership Back On?
Solana trader Kimchi added Pump.fun back to his X bio on Sunday, October 25, three days after removing it, and the KIMCHI meme coin briefly jumped more than 150%. The move reopens the Kimchi crypto saga that began with a deleted token post and a crash last week. Neither Kimchi nor Pump.fun has explained either change.
The comeback landed hours before Pump.fun’s $2.5 million Squads trading competition opens on Monday. The PUMP token hasn’t followed: it trades at $0.0042, down 20% from last Wednesday’s high. So what happened, and what does the bio change mean?
3 days after removing @pumpfun from his bio, @kimchi1x has added it back.$Kimchi briefly surged over 150%.
Coincidentally, trader ja2trader spent $28.9K buying 4.61M $Kimchi just hours before @kimchi1x added @pumpfun back to his bio, and is now up $11K.… pic.twitter.com/Wy02vID70j
Some traders said his account had been hacked. Nobody confirmed it, and on-chain tracker Lookonchain found that a group of early wallets made more than $385,000 from the crash.
The bio is back, with the vlog link next to it. That was enough for the market. KIMCHI doubled from about $6 million to $14 million in market value almost instantly, then gave back part of the move. It now sits near $8.8 million on DEX Screener, up about 50% in 24 hours.
One wallet saw it coming. A trader named ja2trader spent $28,900 on 4.61 million $Kimchi hours before the bio change and was up $11,000 when Lookonchain flagged it. That doesn’t prove anyone tipped them off, but it is the second time in a week that a Kimchi move came with well-timed buyers.
So what is happening? Most likely, the deal is restored, or it never truly concluded. The timing points that way. Pump.fun’s Squads competition, with $1.5 million for the winning team, opens on Monday at 14:00 UTC, and Alon has spent the weekend promoting it. A trader with Kimchi’s following is exactly who the launchpad wants on its leaderboard.
The risk is trust. Pump.fun still hasn’t explained the deleted repost, and Kimchi hasn’t said whether he was hacked. Each silent move now sends a token up or down within minutes, which rewards whoever acts first. Until one of them speaks, traders are betting on a bio line.
The Kimchi deal hasn’t helped PUMP so far. The token climbed to $0.005224 on October 21, the day after the signing, then lost 18% in five days. It now trades below its 50-day EMA at $0.004607.
The first support is $0.003832, the October 18 low. Below it, $0.00375 is the floor that held in late September. On the upside, PUMP needs to reclaim the 50-day EMA first, and then $0.005224 to show the Kimchi news is helping.
Follow 99Bitcoins on X For the Latest Market Updates and Subscribe on YouTube For Daily Expert Market Analysis.
Established in 2013, 99Bitcoins' team members have been crypto experts since Bitcoin’s early days.
Alex is a seasoned cryptocurrency trader and market analyst with over seven years of active experience in the digital asset space. Since entering the markets in 2017, Alex has specialized in identifying emerging "meta" trends and high-volatility narratives. Notably, Alex... Read More
Asanat Analysis — Why it matters
Kimchi's bio revision signals potential reconciliation with Pump.fun, a Solana-based token launchpad that has faced regulatory scrutiny and liquidity concerns since mid-2024. The 150% token pump on mere symbolic messaging—rather than announced partnerships or product developments—exemplifies meme coin volatility driven by influencer sentiment rather than fundamental catalysts. This pattern reflects how reputation and social proof substitute for utility in sub-billion-dollar tokens.
The silence from both parties is notable. Absent official statements, the market is pricing in speculation about renewed commercial ties or backing, yet Kimchi's previous removal (and current reinstatement) suggests either a negotiation reversal or a calculated social media play to revive token momentum. For Pump.fun, association with high-profile traders amplifies volume but also concentration risk; for retail participants, such cycles often mark local highs for exit liquidity rather than genuine partnership signals.