HomeCrypto News

Next for the U.S. SEC: Agency's chief crypto counsel illuminates path for custody

CoinDesk
Next for the U.S. SEC: Agency's chief crypto counsel illuminates path for custody

Taylor Lindman, the top lawyer on the agency's Crypto Task Force, says the SEC is trying to get firms comfortable with blockchain technology and crypto assets.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — As the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is blazing through much of its crypto agenda, trying to nail down a U.S. regulatory structure in the absence of a solution from Congress, its rules for the proper custody of crypto assets are coming soon.

The SEC has a proposal for custody — governing both investment firms and broker-dealers — under White House review, and Taylor Lindman, chief counsel of the SEC's Crypto Task Force, said the effort is meant to allow the market to "understand how you can carry a non-security crypto asset within a broker-dealer without needing some special registration" and to make clear for investment advisers where they can park client assets, such as in a state-chartered trust.

"The big picture with this is we're trying to assimilate the existing securities intermediaries and our existing market participants into a world where they feel comfortable utilizing blockchain, even holding crypto assets, transacting crypto assets, and that includes crypto assets that are securities as well as crypto assets that are non-securities," Lindman said Tuesday at the CoinDesk Policy & Regulation event in Washington.

Once the idea is cleared by the Office of Management and Budget at the White House, the agency can formally propose it and take comment from the industry and public. Meanwhile, Lindman cited the agency's staff statement in December that was meant as an interim approach to steer broker-dealers on how they should handle crypto custody until the rules are in place, and he also referenced its move in September 2025 to allow investment advisers to park customer assets with state-chartered trusts as qualified crypto custodians.

The SEC's previous effort to pursue a custody rule in 2023 was under a decidedly different regime, and then-SEC Chair Gary Gensler said that crypto firms themselves wouldn't qualify to custody the assets. That rule, though, never moved to final form and was scrapped when President Donald Trump returned to the White House and appointed crypto-friendly leadership at the regulator.

Speaking more broadly of the agency's crypto agenda, which has recently included a proposed rule to allow for crypto offerings and a new exemption to clear the way for tokenized securities, Lindman characterized the work as "foundation laying," adding that "some of the foundation laying is boring."

"It's the customary steps associated with taking what was once like this really unique and scary asset, and now saying, 'Hey, look, this is how we think about stablecoins, or this is how we think about non-security crypto assets,' and really trying to put them within a framework that can be built upon for every generation to come," Lindman said. "We need to kind of meet the market where it's at."

As stablecoins move into regulated finance, APAC is becoming a key proving ground. This report maps the region’s rules, use cases, and RLUSD’s role.

Asanat Analysis — Why it matters

Taylor Lindman's public positioning as SEC crypto counsel signals a shift from pure enforcement toward constructive rulemaking on custody—a persistent gap in U.S. regulatory infrastructure. The agency's stated goal of making firms 'comfortable with blockchain technology' reflects acknowledgment that institutional adoption has stalled partly due to regulatory ambiguity around asset safeguarding, not just technical barriers. This mirrors similar moves by the CFTC and state regulators to define custody standards.

The timing matters: institutional demand for crypto exposure (via ETFs, pension mandates, treasury diversification) has grown faster than custody clarity. By telegraphing a custody pathway, the SEC reduces the regulatory arbitrage incentive that currently pushes institutional assets offshore or into non-bank custodians. However, 'getting firms comfortable' is deliberately vague—watch whether this produces actual guidance (safe harbor rules, qualified custodian definitions) or remains advisory. Prior SEC cryptocurrency efforts have often resulted in enforcement actions rather than clear frameworks, so execution risk remains high.

SEC ▲ Institutional crypto custodians ▲ Offshore crypto platforms ▼
Originally reported by CoinDesk. Read the original article →

AI-powered DeFi intelligence, daily

Asanat distills 100+ premium crypto newsletters and live market data into personalized insights.

Try the Asanat Platform