Home › Crypto News

Why McDonalds, Microsoft and Google saying no to tokenized stocks isn't a dealbreaker

CoinDesk
Why McDonalds, Microsoft and Google saying no to tokenized stocks isn't a dealbreaker

Some of the world's biggest companies objected to being listed on the first tokenized securities trading venue under the SEC's innovation exemption. But the early pushback may say more about issuer ca...

This is an excerpt from CoinDesk's new ‘Tokenization Weekly’ newsletter that will be launching soon. Sign-up details will be here when it goes live.

The SEC's new framework for tokenized stock trading looked, at first glance, roughly a month ago, like a fast track to putting U.S. equities on crypto rails.

A growing group of public companies has objected to having their shares traded on the tokenized-securities venue being built by OKX and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the owner of the New York Stock Exchange.

This week’s of objections included some of the biggest names yet: Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL), Goldman Sachs (GS) McDonalds (MCD) and three others on Monday, then Wells Fargo (WFC) and Cisco (CSCO) and four more firms on Friday rejected having tokenized versions of their shares traded on OKXICE, bringing the disclosed total now to 22 objecting issuers.

Seeing some of the world's largest companies say no may not exactly be the start that tokenization advocates had hoped for.

Before trading in a company's shares, a venue must notify the issuer and give the issuer 30 days to object. If the company stays silent, trading can begin.

That gives public companies a say in whether unaffiliated third parties tokenize and trade their shares, but it also tilts the decision toward caution.

Global law firm Latham & Watkins has warned issuers that silence effectively becomes an irrevocable decision: the SEC order provides no mechanism to object after the 30-day window or withdraw a prior non-objection once trading begins.

So when a legal or investor-relations team receives notice about a new market structure it may know little about, saying no while it figures things out can be the rational choice.

“Most of these companies had no idea a third party had tokenized their stock until the OKXICE notice went up,” Dave Hendricks, CEO and founder of tokenization firm Vertalo, told CoinDesk.

“Once they do, the questions come fast: who holds the shares behind the token, how do dividends and votes reach those holders, what does the transfer agent see?” he added.

If those questions can't be answered within 30 days, he said, objecting makes sense.

Olivia Vande Woude, head of tokenization at Ava Labs, also cautioned against reading the growing list as a verdict on OKXICE.

“It's the first venue to send notices under the SEC's Innovation Exemption, so it's the first to get the answers,” she said.

And because objecting costs nothing while silence counts as consent, she expects the list to keep growing.

“Given how easy the opt-out is, the list of objectors is likely to keep growing, and the next venue that sends notices should expect similar resistance,” Vande Woude said.

That may be less a sign that the experiment is failing than an indication of what the experiment is uncovering.

“This exemption is a data-gathering exercise,” Vande Woude said. “What it's showing is that public companies want a say in how their shares come onchain.”

The exchange operator has been a vocal supporter of tokenization and is pursuing its own model for tokenized securities. But Nasdaq Inc., whose shares trade under NDAQ, said it intends to object to having tokenized versions of its own stock traded on TSVs under the current exemption.

Nasdaq warned that TSVs operating outside the National Market System (NMS) could fragment liquidity, weaken price discovery and lack safeguards such as real-time best-price display and consolidated-tape reporting. Its own model keeps tokenized securities inside the existing exchange framework.

Reid Noch, vice president of U.S. equity market structure at TD Securities, told CoinDesk the bigger issue is that the upside for issuers remains difficult to quantify. Tokenization could bring additional demand for U.S. shares, particularly from overseas investors, but the SEC framework may not generate enough new demand to offset the risks of thin, 24/7 trading outside the familiar market structure.

Securitize (SECZ), which specializes in tokenized securities, told CoinDesk it does not plan to object to inclusion on the OKX-ICE venue. A representative of digital asset custodian BitGo (BTGO) also said in an email that the company won't object to the listing.

Both have an obvious interest in helping the tokenized-asset market grow, but Securitize's response also pointed to what may be needed for more traditional companies to get comfortable.

The firm said it has been reaching out to issuers that are or may become involved with its own tokenized stocks, including through webinars explaining the different trading models, shareholder rights and potential trade-offs.

Asanat Analysis — Why it matters

The rejection by blue-chip corporates of tokenized securities trading signals a maturity moment for the sector: legitimate infrastructure exists, but institutional adoption requires solving non-technical problems. Companies like McDonald's, Microsoft, and Google declining participation reflects risk-aversion to regulatory ambiguity and reputational exposure, not technological feasibility. Their hesitation is rational—early adopters of novel capital markets structures face compliance friction, shareholder communication overhead, and minimal operational benefit versus traditional markets.

More significantly, this validates a thesis about tokenized securities adoption curves: issuers will arrive in stages. First movers will likely be smaller-cap companies, SPACs, or entities already comfortable with regulatory experimentation (biotech, fintech). The Fortune 500's caution actually de-risks the SEC's Reg A+ innovation exemption by filtering toward genuine use-case applications rather than speculative hype. A successful venue with mid-market issuers builds the track record and operational maturity needed to eventually convince incumbent corporates that tokenization offers measurable settlement speed or custody advantages.

The headline's framing—'not a dealbreaker'—understands this. A trading venue doesn't require immediate Fortune 500 participation to prove economic viability. It requires sufficient liquidity, regulatory clarity, and demonstrated risk management. The real metric to watch: whether subsequent issuers emerge in Q1 2027, and whether secondary market volumes justify the infrastructure investment.

SEC Tokenized Securities Markets ▲ McDonald's Microsoft Google
Originally reported by CoinDesk. Read the original article →

AI-powered DeFi intelligence, daily

Asanat distills 100+ premium crypto newsletters and live market data into personalized insights.

Try the Asanat Platform