Home › Crypto News

Intel, Oracle, IBM join growing list of firms objecting to OKX–ICE tokenized stock plans

CoinDesk
Intel, Oracle, IBM join growing list of firms objecting to OKX–ICE tokenized stock plans

The latest notice added four objections, bringing the total to 26 as the joint venture prepares to test the SEC’s new framework for blockchain-based stock trading.

IBM, Oracle, Intel and IonQ have opted out of plans by crypto exchange OKX and NYSE parent Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) to offer blockchain-based trading of their shares, bringing the total number of issuer objections to 26.

The four companies were named in an updated public notice dated Monday, Oct. 26, from OKXICE, the two firms’ joint venture. They join earlier objectors including Microsoft, Alphabet, Goldman Sachs, Cisco and Wells Fargo.

The growing list underscores a hurdle for OKXICE and the SEC’s new framework for tokenized stock trading: building a market that issuers are willing to join. The agency’s five-year “Innovation Exemption” gives qualifying venues room to test round-the-clock blockchain-based trading of stocks, and it also gives public companies an option to block their shares from being offered.

OKXICE issued its initial public notice on Oct. 4, outlining plans to use Uniswap v4 liquidity pools on OKX’s XLayer blockchain, with transactions settled in stablecoins. The venue would use automated market makers — software that executes trades through pools of assets rather than matching buyers and sellers through a conventional order book.

Under the framework, venues must notify issuers and give them 30 days to object before offering tokenized versions of their shares.

All four newly disclosed objectors were among the 62 companies in OKXICE’s original proposed roster. That brings objections from the original selection to 23, or about 37%, according to a CoinDesk tally. The overall count also includes Cerebras Systems, Arm Holdings and Wells Fargo, which were absent from that from the original selection.

The growing list of objections highlights early issuer caution about plans to trade their shares under the SEC’s new framework. The rules give companies a say in how their shares come onchain, but also tilts the decision toward opting out, industry experts told CoinDesk’s Tokenization Weekly. Objecting costs nothing, while staying silent allows trading to begin without a mechanism to withdraw that consent later. For legal and investor-relations teams still getting familiar with the arrangements, saying no leaves more time to understand them.

The financial benefit for issuers is also uncertain yet. Tokenization could bring additional demand, particularly from overseas investors, but that may not be enough to offset concerns about thin, round-the-clock trading outside the familiar market structure, TD Securities’ Reid Noch previously told CoinDesk.

Andrew Cuomo, OKXICE’s co-chairman and former New York governor, previously described the objections as expected, with many companies rather “wait and see how it goes rather than be the first to participate,” he said during a press call last week.

Diversified RWA stablecoins sustain 5-7% yield from real credit as crypto funding compresses to ~4%. GENIUS pushes yield off-chain; TAM grows to $4B in 3 years.

Asanat Analysis — Why it matters

The escalating opposition to OKX and Intercontinental Exchange's tokenized stock initiative—now 26 objections from major corporates—signals deepening institutional friction around on-chain equity infrastructure. Intel, Oracle, and IBM's public stance likely reflects concerns about custody standards, market manipulation vectors, and whether blockchain settlement actually improves institutional workflows versus introducing operational risk. This mirrors earlier pushback against other blockchain-native financial experiments: resistance often centers on regulatory ambiguity and incumbent competitive threats rather than technical feasibility.

The SEC's approval of this testing framework itself represents a meaningful regulatory boundary-test, but corporate objections constrain practical deployment. Large enterprises filing formal complaints effectively raise the cost of implementation and create legal/reputational exposure for OKX and ICE. The pattern suggests tokenized equities will face longer adoption cycles than DeFi protocols—institutional adoption requires not just regulatory green lights but also stakeholder consensus that blockchain settlement solves genuine pain points rather than introducing novel risks. Watch whether these objections trigger SEC guidance clarifications or force material framework revisions before broader rollout.

OKX ▼ Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) ▼ Intel Oracle IBM SEC
Originally reported by CoinDesk. Read the original article →

AI-powered DeFi intelligence, daily

Asanat distills 100+ premium crypto newsletters and live market data into personalized insights.

Try the Asanat Platform