Why Bitcoin’s Liquidity Advantage Matters as Institutions Move In
Bitcoin Magazine Why Bitcoin’s Liquidity Advantage Matters as Institutions Move In SALT Lending CEO Shawn Owen explains why Bitcoin’s portability gives it an advantage over traditional assets and why...
SALT Lending CEO Shawn Owen explains why Bitcoin’s portability gives it an advantage over traditional assets and why institutional adoption may only be getting started.
Bitcoin’s portability, divisibility and accessibility could increasingly distinguish it from traditional stores of value as more institutions enter the market, according to SALT Lending CEO and Co-Founder Shawn Owen.
Speaking on BMTV, Owen pointed to Bitcoin’s resilience while gold and other long-duration assets sold off, arguing that some of Bitcoin’s most basic characteristics give it advantages over competing assets.
“It’s easier to move Bitcoin out of, say, somewhere where you need to leave quickly because there’s unrest in the area than gold,” Owen said. “It’s far more portable and divisible and easy to use than real estate.”
SALT CEO Shawn Owen (@Shawn_OwenJ) on why Bitcoin held up while gold and other long duration assets sold off:"It is easier to buy Bitcoin than gold.""It's easier to move Bitcoin out of, say, somewhere where you need to leave quickly because there's unrest in the area than… pic.twitter.com/YQ9KGauue8
Gold, real estate and bitcoin can all serve as long-term stores of value, but accessing and moving that value looks very different.
Physical gold requires storage and transportation. Real estate is tied to a specific location and can take time to buy or sell. Bitcoin can be transferred globally and divided into small units without those same physical constraints.
Those characteristics can also give Bitcoin holders more flexibility when they need liquidity.
Rather than selling bitcoin to access dollars, holders can potentially use it as collateral and borrow against its value while maintaining exposure to the underlying asset.
That model becomes particularly relevant if Owen’s longer-term outlook for Bitcoin adoption proves correct.
Owen believes the experience many individual Bitcoin holders have already gone through, discovering Bitcoin and wishing they had gotten involved earlier, may eventually play out among much larger institutions.
“Every human goes through this experience where you learn about Bitcoin and wish you’d been earlier,” Owen said. “I think that will be true of sovereigns and banks and institutions of all sizes.”
Banks have taken considerably longer to enter the market, but Owen believes that is beginning to change as many of the hurdles surrounding Bitcoin have been addressed.
“Banks have been slow, but are now getting in after all the boxes have been checked,” he said. “FOMO is real.”
JUST IN: Salt Lending CEO says sovereign wealth funds and banks are realizing the importance of Bitcoin 👀"Every human goes through this experience where you learn about Bitcoin and wish you'd been earlier…I think that will be true of sovereigns and banks of all sizes." 🚀 pic.twitter.com/2pxKVh1Q2O
Owen cautioned that adoption and price appreciation will not necessarily happen in a straight line. As Bitcoin matures and more capital enters the market, he expects some dampening of its historic volatility.
“Adoption depends on the time horizon we’re talking about,” Owen said. “Dampening of volatility, and we will continue to see that, but that doesn’t mean over the next decade we won’t see serious adoption and increase in price.”
That long-term view also shapes how Owen thinks holders should approach their bitcoin.
“I have always said never sell your bitcoin,” Owen said. “Long term we will continue to see prices increasing significantly in comparison to fiat currencies.”
For holders who share that outlook, selling bitcoin to cover a large purchase, business expense or other liquidity need means giving up future exposure to the bitcoin they sell.
SALT allows eligible borrowers to use bitcoin as collateral to access cash without selling the underlying bitcoin. Once the loan is repaid, the collateral is returned to the borrower.
The model aligns closely with Owen’s broader thesis. If Bitcoin continues becoming easier to access and more widely adopted by banks, institutions and potentially sovereigns, long-term holders may become increasingly reluctant to sell simply because they need liquidity.
Instead, they can potentially maintain their bitcoin position while accessing the value stored within it.
As Bitcoin adoption expands, the conversation may increasingly move beyond how to acquire bitcoin and toward how holders can use the wealth they have accumulated without necessarily selling the asset.
Asanat Analysis — Why it matters
Bitcoin's liquidity advantage—stemming from 24/7 trading across fragmented global markets, deep order books, and absence of settlement friction—creates structural arbitrage opportunities that traditional assets cannot match. As institutions allocate capital to crypto, this liquidity moat becomes economically material: spot markets, futures, and derivatives can absorb large position sizes with minimal slippage, reducing execution costs relative to equities or commodities with T+2 settlement and regional trading halts.
The portability angle signals a broader institutional narrative: Bitcoin functions as a self-custodied, borderless collateral asset unconstrained by banking rails or regulatory jurisdictions. This matters less for retail traders than for institutional treasurers managing multi-billion dollar portfolios seeking non-correlated stores of value. However, the liquidity narrative also masks concentration risk—most volume still flows through a handful of exchanges (Binance, Coinbase, Kraken), meaning genuine institutional scale could face the same depth constraints equities solved via electronic market structure decades ago.
The timing reflects post-ETF maturation: spot Bitcoin ETFs (2024 US approval) removed custody and regulatory friction, but institutions still evaluate execution venue fragmentation and slippage curves. Portability alone doesn't guarantee liquidity if regulatory divergence or exchange concentration creates local illiquidity traps—a critical gap between theoretical and realized advantages.